Saturday, February 25, 2012

The Makings of a Grassroots Movement Brewing: Greensboro comes Alive


By Victor Lopez, Intern – AFSC Office of the Carolinas


About the Author: Lopez is a senior at Guilford College in Greensboro, NC, majoring in Peace and Conflict Studies, was the 2008 college winner of the Nation Magazine student essay contest. He writes for the College paper, The Guilfordian.

Greensboro, NC- Feb. 20-  The community forum titled “Bring our War
Dollars Home” encouraged citizens of North Carolina to urge their
legislatures to spend tax dollars more wisely. The  information
discussed at that meeting could cause a grassroots movement to ignite
in the college town.

The American Friends Service Committee and North Carolina Peace Action
held the event at Elon Law School in downtown Greensboro, for
what some hope will be a continuing conversation regarding the
wasteful spending of tax dollars, in the face of growing joblessness
in North Carolina.

Matthew Hoh      photo credit Lori Fernald Khamala


The potential grassroots movement is starting at a time when the Obama
Administration’s 2013 budget scales back Defense Department spending
by an estimated half trillion dollars over the next ten years.

North Carolinians have responded to the news of Obama’s plan with
varying reactions.

Some believe that any reduction in military spending
will hurt small business owners who are dependent on defense
contracts, while others view the proposed cuts as an opportunity to
turn tax dollars, otherwise spent on defense, into meaningful
community resources.


“Considering the mix of different community leaders with varying
interests, all converging here, I’d say this is a historical moment,”
said Isabell Moore, the forum’s moderator and adjunct professor of
history at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

During the forum, activists discussed  the foreclosure
crisis facing the community: a local realtor spoke  about  the sight of
abandoned houses foreclosed upon; a chief editor of the local
newspaper spoke of helping those experiencing hunger, homelessness and

poverty.

Later an economist asked rhetorical questions about wealth trickling
down to those who need jobs, and a representative for the Fund for
Democratic Communities spoke about locally democratizing the budget.

Many worry about the future of Greensboro with an unemployment rate
having climbed to 10 percent,  in a city that a 2011 Stanford
study found to be  one of the cities having the greatest income
disparities.


Matthew Hoh speaks at Elon University Law.     photo credit Lori Fernald Khamala

An estimated 130 participants attended the community forum. Some North
Carolina legislators such as State Rep. Pricy Harris (D), Marcus
Brandon (D), Alma Adams (D) and Sen. Gladys A. Robinson also attended.

Keynote speaker Matthew Hoh spoke to the policies and dialogues that
keep U.S. defense spending at unprecedented levels. Hoh served as a
U.S. Marine and later worked at the State Department as a senior
civilian representative and political adviser on Afghanistan.

“Once the U.S. creates a dialogue of victory, the military action will
continue whether or not it makes little social or fiscal sense,” said
Hoh, who in 2009 quit his post at the State Department, making him
the only senior state department official to publicly resign in
protest of the Afghanistan war.

Hoh said that without public desire, the Obama administration would
not stop the war. Unless there is clear public support, elected
officials are often called unpatriotic for pulling troops out of war
zones.

“The president needs to understand he has the political support to end
the war in Afghanistan,” said Hoh. “Our leaders won’t do a thing about
the war in Afghanistan unless we let them know they have our support”

Ann Lennon, area director of the American Friends Service Committee
Office of the Carolinas, said that diverting tax dollars from Defense
Department coffers to education, health care and social services,
rests primarily on priorities, not just on economic expediency.


“What we need to do is really consider where our priorities are,
bearing in mind the actions of our country over the last decade have
cost so much, yielded so little,” said Lennon.  “We are giving the
generation to come a lot less than we were left.”

North Caronlina State Rep. Marcus Brandon shares a word with ASFC Intern Victor Lopez before the
event commenced.                                                              photo credit Lori Fernald Khamala
MIT professor emeritus and linguist Noam Chomsky agreed with
Lennon’s observations, saying in an e-mail interview, that U.S.
spending has reached unimaginable heights and can hardly be considered
defense related, in any meaningful sense.

“As long as U.S. policies remain as they are, they will require a huge
military force all over the world, unique in the world today, and with
no historical precedent,” said Chomsky. “It is the policies that
should be under review.”

Back in Greensboro, others, like Lennon, think that the
city is as good a place as any to bring public awareness and continue
the conversation started at the Elon Law School  event. After all, the city
is no stranger to activism, as evident by the city's role in the civil
rights movement.

Lennon said that she expects the forum in Greensboro to be one of many
continuing conversations about how to turn the information learned,
gathered and related into meaningful action.

“We need more discussions that articulate the city’s values,
priorities and future hopes,” said Lennon. “It builds the capacity of
community members to deliberate and decide where their priorities
lie.”

Logie Meachum, an educator, storyteller and musician, said there has
always been a kind of magic that has transformed Greensboro into a
town that has effected change.

“With hope,” Meachum said, “that enchantment will reveal itself once more.”

Friday, February 17, 2012

Press Release - Former State Department Official to Visit Elon University School of Law




For Immediate Release - Contact:  Ann Lennon, email: ALennon@afsc.org,             336–854–0633      


 

Greensboro, NC- American Friends Service Committee, Office of the Carolinas, announced today the upcoming visit of Matthew Hoh, a US military strategist, who resigned over US war policy in Afghanistan, will join dozens of Greensboro community leaders and organizations to call for major economic change.

Hoh was a key U.S. official in Afghanistan who resigned in protest over U.S. policy in the war-torn region, as the Obama administration deliberates its future strategy there.

Hoh has served with the US Marine Corps in Iraq and on US Embassy teams in both Afghanistan and Iraq. News of Hoh’s resignation was syndicated across the world.

The Greensboro Community Forum will take place Monday, February 20th, 6pm at Elon University’s Law School. The event is open to the public and free of charge.

Hoh will address the Greensboro audience with prospective on: A shift federal budget priorities; a transition from our war economy into a peace economy; Ways to address growing economic inequality in Greensboro and the US, and a broad effort to support local job creation and local economies.

Greensboro leaders will also speak to a growing number of urgent concerns including: High rates of foreclosure and the impact on children in Greensboro; 20% of Greensboro now live in poverty; A rising wave of homelessness and hunger; College tuition hikes that reinforces a widening
opportunity gap; Democratizing the budget process starting locally.

For more information please contact Ann Lennon at The American Friends Service Committee,             336–854–0633      .






# # # # # #

Wednesday, February 1, 2012





As we celebrate the February 1st anniversary of the sit-in movement in Greensboro, NC--we examine the civil rights movement as a whole. 


-Victor Lopez, intern 
American Friends Service Committee Office of the Carolinas 

1963 Citizenship Education "Voter" in mock election.                      (photo Liz Butters)

AFSC Active in Promoting Voting Rights in 1960’s Rural South
Fiftieth Anniversary Reunion Planned
by Judy Vaughan
The American Friends Service Committee played a role in the overthrow of segregation in the South. Former participants in a 1963 AFSC project in Warrenton, North Carolina met at the home of Elliott Isenberg of San Francisco December 17-18, 2011 to remember this quiet little civil rights project and to reflect on its lasting effect.
The seven former participants recalled creating and presenting workshops in voter registration and voting procedures in rural churches in a North Carolina county where few African-Americans were registered to vote. Based in segregated Warrenton, North Carolina, the fourteen college students and their three leaders were the first interracial group to live together in Warren County.
The 1963 Citizenship Education Project was initiated and strongly supported by Warrenton resident Eva Clayton, who teamed with rural ministers to sponsor educational workshops to encourage voter registration and other civic activism among the impoverished Black majority.  Eva was elected to Congress in 1992. The first African-American woman elected to the U. S. Congress from North Carolina, she served for ten years. She remains active in community issues, and supports plans for a fiftieth anniversary reunion in Warrenton in 2013.
1963 Citizenship Education group members attending the gathering from California were Elliott Isenberg, Gavin Wright, Judith Vaughan, Steve Dautoff, Betsey Sweeney with son Jon and husband Randy Sweeney, and Peter Clausen, whose late mother Bronwyn Baird had been a member of the project. Members Jane Luton from Washington, D.C. and Liz Butters from Colorado attended. British participants Julian Bicknell and Gwyneth Love visited via SKYPE.
Anyone interested in remembering this project or participating in the reunion in 2013 may contact Judy (Beil) Vaughan at jfbvaughan@comcast.net.
                                                                                   




Thursday, January 26, 2012

Know not the Person’s Skin or Color, but the Person Underneath

Reflections on the Muslim Self Portraits Exhibit on display at Guilford College:
Jan 9-Feb 29, 2012

By: Thomas Kerr,  a Center for Principled Problem Solving Scholar - Guilford College

When I first walked into the gallery I was dazzled by all of the self-portraits that covered the entire room.  After taking a quick glance at all the portraits that surrounded me I got the impression of “who are these people?”  There were multiple portraits posted all over the room with faces of Muslim people in their everyday lives. Each of the portraits showed a Muslim person in their everyday lives like playing basketball, wearing normal attire, praying, and being with friends.  It made me feel welcomed into the room which made it comfortable for me to walk-around and see all the wonderful portraits of different Muslim people.  The gallery displayed both male and female characters in their portraits which gave me a much better idea of both genders of the Muslim people.  Each portrait had a small description note placed on the side of the portrait emphasizing the portraits meaning.  Also, while I was looking at the portraits and their description notes made me feel like each one in the gallery was trying to send a message to me about themselves as a person. 



thankyouUSAsmall
” Thank God and thank you America for giving me a new life.” – Ansar
(sign translated from Urdu)

I stepped closer to the portraits to read the meaning behind portrait.  There was one portrait where an elderly man was holding what looked like a white sign with Arabic writing on it.  I can only remember was that this man was thanking America (the United States) for helping his son make a good life in this land.  I had a strange feeling about this portrait because I was just moved how this man was so different from what a lot of news & television say about Muslim people.  In the past years I only knew Muslim people as an enemy, a threat, people who had no peace in their minds and were not visually scene as human beings based on what I saw from the media.  It was very interesting to learn more about this person, who is a Muslim, rather than hearing from newscasters or the press. 

Experiencing this man’s portrait and his meaning behind it made me realized that both of us were very similar.  For example, like how both of us were mistaken for a lot of things and people did not really know much about us or who we are.  Like how this elderly man as a Muslim many people see him as a threat to the United States while me as a Native Hawaiian people in the US think of me living in grass huts where the girls wear only coconut bras.  Also, this elderly man is Muslim who has been able to find great happiness in America while the many Americans shun away Muslims from their society.  I love to enjoy my Hawaiian culture by dancing hula and playing the ukulele but in my community a huge racial conflict between whites and native Hawaiians has caused lots of separation between the two groups.  It is amazing to think that in this world people can only see the color of your skin, but never visualize the person underneath the skin.  I love being a Hawaiian because I love my culture, the food, the history, and everything about it.  It is who I am on the inside.  All I wish is that people finally ease off of their racial ideas and hatred in order to give others a chance to show who they really are.  

This gallery was such a great experience to learn about Muslim people and about themselves as a person. It made me really understand and realize the normal, everyday life style of the people who are Muslim.  I may have not learned everything about this Muslim people but I was able to get a little taste of who they are as a person. 

Experiencing this extraordinary gallery makes me yearn for the next upcoming events like “Poetic Portraits of a Revolution” will begin be on February 10 at 7:30pm in the Art Gallery at Guilford College.  Also, I hope to have a chance to see the gallery of the “Women & Islam panel” in the Art Gallery on the 22nd of February at Guilford College.  Overall, my learning experience of the Muslim people is just getting started.     

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Guest Entry: Susan Ikenberry

 
Blog 1:  End of the “Modern Agenda”?
I am a long–time supporter of AFSC, a member of New Garden Friends Meeting in Greensboro, NC, and have been active in the Occupy Greensboro community.  Here are a few of my reasons…
~

          There was a time (actually the current time) when the argument was made that, if we ended U.S. involvement in wars, if we reduced the military budget, then more of our tax dollars would shift to the public sector – to improving education, healthcare, and green energy and to putting people back to work.
As a peace studies major in college I participated in an “economics of peace” research seminar that aimed at making a financial argument against war.  We students first determined how many tax dollars that originated in each of Indiana’s major cities were used by the U.S. government to support the military and war.  Each of us was then assigned one of these cities to live in for a month.  We interviewed city planners, educators, health care people, community groups, businesses… to develop a plan of how the amount citizens paid in war taxes could be instead spent on local needs.  The research was then used in publicized to illustrate what we could be doing for the civic good if we were not involved in military build–ups and in fighting wars like Vietnam.
In retrospect I see now that this project reflected the prevailing belief that the role of our nation–state was to promote and defend the civic or common good.  We expected that if those wars were ended, urgent community needs (health care, education, infrastructure…) would be addressed by the state with our tax dollars.  This expectation that the state is all about promoting the civic good is sometimes referred to as the “modern agenda” – to mobilize “productivity and technology to raise living standards and use progressive taxation, public regulation, central banking and financial reform to distribute wealth fairly and make societies more equal.”[i]  Perhaps the height of the modern agenda followed World War II, e.g. the 1960s’ Great Society reforms that intervened at local, state, and national levels to promote social, economic, and educational equality and to protect constitutional rights.
The current consensus, however, seems to be that the “modern agenda” is over.[ii]  The logic of the state has changed radically since that economics of peace project several decades ago.  Underneath the decades of jostling back and forth between Republican and Democratic parties was a more fundamental shift to a government beholden to and run by financial interests.  I recall when Republican leaders began talking about “freedom” instead of “democracy.”  Clearly this was a linguistic adjustment reflecting the change in our national agenda:
–from a state whose purpose was to promote fair and equal treatment and to protect the common/civic good,
–to a state whose purpose is to protect the advantage of the most wealthy in their pursuit of the highest profits – and then to distribute the costs (but not the wealth) among the rest of us.
So, let’s return to the original question concerning war and its domestic cost... We must end our country’s sponsorship of and protractive role in war and military conflicts that are resulting in tremendous suffering, loss of life, disruptions of whole societies’ access to livelihoods and a future, and a generation of children whose initial view of the world is through the visage of war.  Ending war is a first step in building a more peaceful world, one that recognizes our equal value and interdependence.
But, what about the argument that ending war would shift resources to urgently needed domestic civic purposes?  Given the new finance and free market logic of the state, if military spending is decreased or military conflicts ended, would that automatically translate into solving domestic problems such as the growing numbers who are homeless, lacking adequate healthcare, hungry, angry and depressed, internalizing or misdirecting blame for their job loss, desperate about how they will care for the ones they love, calculating and recalculating what else to cut out and what to pay, or peering out at a future without promise?  In the current finance–governing system, it seems unlikely.
It also seems unlikely that we will make adequate headway ending wars over resources and markets without also addressing the cooptation of our governing systems for the accumulation of wealth for the few.
Given that this market–driven system is wreaking havoc in the lives of the 99% all around the world, it is more urgent than ever to link with people in all parts of the globe in order to redirect our social, political, and economic systems.  It is also more possible.  We have already seen how people have creatively applied new developments in technology to unanticipated ends – to connect and organize social movements (through the movement of ideas, not arms in the Arab Spring and the Occupy movement), and to document and watchdog violations of civic rights.  Our global 99% has endless potential for innovation, problem–solving, and for imagining and fashioning a new Modern Agenda.



[i] Hudson, Michael.  “The Financial Road to Serfdom – How Bankers Use the Debt Crisis to Roll Back the Progressive Era.”  Global Research. 13 June 2011.  http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=25250.
[ii] Hudson, op. cit.